Page Comparison

...

1. When collecting data, take pictures of your subjects in the static pose. These pictures are valuable for evaluating the results of the Scale Tool.
2. Measure subject specifics, like height, mass, body segment lengths, mass distribution (if DXA is available), and strength (if a Biodex is available). You can use this data, along with marker positions, to best match the generic model to a specific subject.
3. Have your subjects perform movements to calculate functional joint centers at the hip, knee, ankle, and/or shoulders, and append the joint centers to your static trial data (see Associating Data with a Motion).
4. These are just a few tips. Also review our full guide to Collecting Experimental Data.

Scale Settings:

1. Rely on markers that correspond to anatomical landmarks and functional joint centers (FJC) to position and scale the generic model.
   
   1. See How to Use the Scale Tool for information about defining the measurement set for scaling and setting weights when positioning the model in the static pose.
2. Some segments, like the pelvis and torso, are often best scaled non-uniformly. For example, see the torso scale settings in the section on the Scale Factors Pane in How to Use the Scale Tool.
3. Review How Scaling Works for more information about Scale Settings.

...

1. Scaling a model is an iterative process. Use the "preview static pose" option in the GUI. See the section on "Previewing Scale" in the How to Use the Scale Tool section for more information. After running preview, perform steps 2 to 5 described below.
2. Check the "Messages" window, which has information about the results of scaling, including the overal RMS marker error and the maximum marker error.
   
   1. In general, maximum marker errors for bony landmarks should be less than 2 cm.
   2. RMS error should typically be less than 1 cm.
   3. Pay close attention to errors in the bony landmark and FJC markers when assessing the quality of your scaling results.
3. Visualize the scaled model's anatomical marker positions relative to the corresponding experimental markers to see how well the model "fits" the data. Use the pictures you took to assess the results, comparing the joint angles in the "Coordinates" window to the angles you observe in the pictures.
   
   1. Do the hip, knee, and ankle angles after scaling match what you observe in the picture?
   2. Are there any large mismatches between experimental and model markers? Can these mismatches be explained by examining the pictures you took?
   3. If pictures aren't available, use what you know about a typical static pose capture. For example, the ankle angle is generally less than 5º and hip flexion angle is less than 10º.
   4. Again, pay close attention to errors in the landmark and FJC markers when assessing the quality of your scaling results.
4. After examining the "Messages" window and performing a visual comparison, adjust the virtual markers and marker weightings to improve your results.
   
   1. Again, avoid adjusting the positions of the landmark and FJC virtual markers to match the experimental markers.
5. Once you've adjusted the virtual marker positions and the scale settings, preview the new static pose. Reassess your results using steps 2 to 4 above. Once you are happy with your results, hit "Run" to generate a scaled model and adjust the virtual markers on the model to match all of the experimental markers.

...